Theory of Knowledge and Reason - 1375 Words

History is most often associated with past events, other associations being hypothetical : interpreting what if theories and revisionist history. The human sciences deals with multiple fields, but those fields all generally include the factor of the human population or the human individual, hence the name human sciences. It is said that a historians task is to understand the past, while the human scientists task is to change the future. Yet there are counterclaims to these descriptions of a historians and a human scientists task. These descriptions may not be completely true in the areas of knowledge. In the areas of knowledge of history and the human sciences, individuals come to know the task of a historian and human scientist through language and reason. Historians come to know the past through surviving records and texts. This is the language aspect of history. It is through the language of those texts, that individuals come to know what the past was like. A famous example is the deciphering of Egyptian hieroglyphs. Historians came to know what the hieroglyphs were saying mainly through the Rosetta Stone, an object that contained Egyptian hieroglyphs, Demotic script, and Ancient Greek in the form of three texts with the same content. Had the Rosetta Stone not been found, historians may still be struggling to understand hieroglyphs today. This way of knowing though has flaws. Due to history being learned through records, texts, or essentially sources ofShow MoreRelatedEssay John Locke943 Words   |  4 Pagesthe most compelling theory of metaphysics. First, I explain Locke’s point that all humans are born as Tabula Rasa, in order to gain basic understanding of where Locke begins his theory. Second, I discuss how Locke argues how we obtain knowledge, empiricism and representationalism, and knowledge about the work varies between strong and weak inferences. Third, I will provide counter examples to Locke’s ideas, and will explain why these cou nter examples work for Locke’s theories provided. Finally, IRead MoreThe Historical Development Of Areas Of Knowledge1621 Words   |  7 PagesShould key events in the historical development of areas of knowledge always be judged by the standards of their time? Judy Taylor Theory of Knowledge Word Count: 1599 ‘Should key events in the historical development of areas of knowledge always be judged by the standards of their time?’ This question can really only be answered on a case-by-case basis. For example, the first IPod Touch was a groundbreaking advancement in portable music and digital entertainment, however, if comparedRead MoreThe Gettier Problem: A Marathon Essay1081 Words   |  5 Pagesepistemology – the theory of knowledge. For years, philosophers have analyzed and questions what knowledge is, its value, sources, structure, and whether we know anything at all. Epistemology questions what knowledge is and how we as humans can acquire it – which involves much debate. Though our understanding of knowledge is ambiguous, we do know that knowledge is justified, true belief. There have been attempts to answer the queries through the Justified-True-Belief Account of Knowledge (JTB), knownRead MoreThe Importance of Knowledge1241 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.† Knowledge is regarded by many as the ultimate truth and is constantly sought after in all forms. Knowledge, however, does not remain constant and is always changing as people come to learn new and different things about the knowledge and attempt to make sense of it. These many differing theories and interpretations are what cause confusion and differences in a persons beliefs and therefore knowledge. This is why it is importantRead MorePlato s Justified True Belief Theory1343 Words   |  6 PagesFor thousands of years the most prominent theory of knowledge was Plato’s Justified True Belief theory. He was convinced that in order to know something the following criterion must be met: a) one must believe said thing to be true b) said thing must actually be true, and c) one must be justified in believing said thing to be true. This theory made a lot of sense to most epistemologists, and was generally accepted as true for a very long time. It wasn’t until a man named Edmund Gettier wrote aRead MoreTok Essay: That Which Can Be Asserted Without Evidence Can Be Dismissed Without Evidence1540 Words   |  7 Pagesor things that help in attaining knowledge. The statement â€Å"that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence† means that it is possible to confirm and dismiss the same if there is no evidence or proof to form an undebatable judgement. In this essay I am going to analyse this quote from the prospective of different Areas of Knowledge. I will proceed in this way because they differ from each other not only in the branch of human knowledge that they cover, but also in theRead MoreThe Text Of The Meno By Plato938 Words   |  4 Pagesquestion of what virtue is, and whether it is teachable. The paradox explained can be used to discuss merely anything, and we can thus say that either one knows or does not know. If a person knows, then they cannot investigate or question their knowledge. However, if a person does not know, they cannot inquire about it which means a person cannot question for not knowing what they do not know. Plato goes ahead and resolves the paradox in the Meno by saying that, â€Å"one would not seek what he knowsRead MoreHuman Science And Natural Science1276 Words   |  6 PagesDisagreement may aid the pursuit of knowledge in the natural and human sciences because disagreement leads to new discoveries. Disagreement is about gathering reliable knowledge as well as using this newfound knowledge, and occurs when a group fails to reach a consensus over the logic of an argument. Knowledge is composed of facts, information, and skills acquired by a person through experience or education. Two areas of knowledge that are impacted by disagreement are human science and natural scienceRead MoreConstructivism Essay1400 Words   |  6 Pagesrationalists have proposed opposing theories of the acquisition of knowledge, which appear unable to coexist. Each theory holds its own strengths but does not demonstrate a strong argument in itself to the questions, â€Å"Is knowledge truly possible?† and â€Å"How is true knowledge obtained?†. Immanual Kant successfully merged the two philosophies and provided a convincing argument with his theory of empirical relativism, or what some may call constructivism. His theory bridges the gap between rationalismRead MoreThe Theory of Knowledge1372 Words   |  6 Pageswhich is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.† We live in a strange and puzzling world. Despite the exponential growth of knowledge in the past century, we are faced by a baffling multitude of conflicting ideas. The mass of conflicting ideas causes the replacement of knowledge, as one that was previously believed to be true gets replace by new idea. This is accelerated by the rapid development of technology to allow new investigations into knowledge within the areas