Making Connections Essay

In Werner, Hoeflich is sharing genuinely intimate and specific expand intimately his experience. Beard Probably met Hoeflich on several occasions in read to gain his trust before he was up to(p) to collect some of the expand that he included in his work. It more or less likely took Beard days of asking upright the right questions to write Werner. In this tag on, Werner is presented as both weak and strong. In the beginning of the story, he is completely caught clear up guard by the fire in his home, but therefore the reason follows with a story of Werrner cliff amount down.Beard absorbs Werner diving out of his apartment window with athletic elegance, and then proceeds to show us about Werner crying in the ambulance. At the end of the story, Beard describes Werner never creation able to conf purpose himself with the old Werner. I am left(a) wonder what Werner did by and by his accident. We know he always matt-up pain since, but I wonder in what other ways it touch his behavior. Zinner emphasizes balancing quotes with narrations which Beard did really well.He withal spoke of not changing the quotes in order to preserve the geniuss voice. Beard did a very good job of depicting Werners temper done the quotes he chose. 2. Gladwell began the piece by describing an event very vaguely, and then slowly gave us more details. He ended the story by teaching us one of the lessons that Cesar learned through his experience. I like that Gladwell keeps us wondering at the beginning of his piece. He could be talking about any itemise of things.I liked the ending beca expenditure the practice was able to see another aspect of Cesar. Bow, not only was he an ingenious on dog behavior he knew quite a bit about clement behavior as well. I didnt like that he chose to describe Cesar in his introduction. I in any case didnt like that in the conclusion, he told a story of Cesar failing to be able to do his job. I would have a bun in the oven set forth Cesar after I finished verbalize the story of Sugar and Lynda. I would have told the story of Cesar failing before I talked about Cesar learning about human behavior.Gladwell did a good job of sweetener the proofreader. After the first sentence, I was left wondering what Gladwell was talking about. He to a fault did a good job of well-educated when to end the story. If he had continued on for much longer, the reader would have bemused interest. 3. Ingrams message was that this was she experienced was a very confusing time for everyone. not each(prenominal) Germans hated Jews, and not all Jews resented Americans. She wanted to provide a opposite perspective on the war than the ones we harken most often.When I was finished interpret this piece, I felt a genius of sadness. Ingram wanted us to see that although the Hamburg pack were grateful for being saved, they were still pursue by the sight of their dead neighbors and friends. In order for any good to come, sacrific es had to be made. Ingram begins her memoir with a story of her bravely saving her mothers life and uses very frank and blunt lecture in order to establish power. Zinner recommends that an author write without being to egotistical and to use vivid sight and smell language.Ingram did a very good job of mental picture a picture in the readers mind without making herself the superstar in every situation. 4. Rodriguez was trying to tell us that there is a boastful change coming in calcium and in America. No longer do you have to come to atomic number 20 to experience your dream. A person can confront at home and achieve it just as easily, but dont be surprised when it doesnt come true. I imagine that the audience had a love/hate relationship with this piece. They judgement it was beautifully written and brought up tenuous points, but hated to admit that what Rodriguez was verbalism was true.In describing East Cobb, I would use the terms gravid houses, fast food, more cultur es, crowded schools, crowded streets, expensive cats, large lawns, family secrets, intelligent kids, and drug abuse. Rodriguez described the California that we all know, but he also went deeper and described to us in big(p) detail the California that very some battalion see. 5. Singer posed a question. Then, he spent a carve up or two answering the question. He did this repeatedly throughout his work and added support details along the way. Singer gave a very convincing argument.He appealed to the emotions of a sensitive reader with the child in the pond analogy. HE appealed to the logic of a skeptical reader with all his statistics. This phrase would persuade most people to be more charitable. It would not provide a very convincing argument to the people with lower incomes. Singer did a very good job of cutting the clutter. He used simple language and tell exactly what he meant. I also felt Singers personality through his writing. He is very practical and believes that we sh ould all be more charitable.